🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and upsetting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its action.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

This decision is part of a national battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another senior House leader argued the court had another time eroded its standing by approving a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.